You have probably seen it but there is a great series on the War on the Motorist website about helmets. The final installment is here with links to the earlier ones:
Hi Sue, some interesting findings from the global membership of the British Medical Journal reported in today's London Evening Standard
"Bicycle helmets should not be made compulsory, doctors said today. The shock finding came in a poll of readers of the British Medical Journal.
More than two thirds of the journal's readers voted against mandatory cycle helmets for adults.
They said making helmet-wearing compulsory could deter people from taking up cycling - meaning they would not get the health benefits of added exercise."
Detail of the survey on the British Medical Survey website here:
The Punk Commute yesterday was great and exhilarating but I never cease to be surprised by the raw aggression some people display when others are holding an opinion counter to the one they hold
Compelling Reasons to Abolish Mandatory Helmet Laws
* Abuse of civil liberties
* CYCLING IS NOT DANGEROUS!
* Facilitated government abnegation of responsibilities
* Drastically reduced cycling rates by 40% by associating being on a bicycle with danger
* Claimed reduction in head injuries achieved in 'absolute numbers', not relative to actual 'bicycle use'
* Helmets designed for 1 impact only yet many cycle+car collisions involve 2 or more impacts simultaneously (ie windscreen then road)
* No enforceable helmet standards for 4 year olds & under
* Cyclists live at least 2 years & possibly as much as 10 years longer than non-cyclists * Cycling regularly is 20 times more likely to increase your life span than to shorten it
'...increased by a record amount last year to the highest carbon output in history. According to unpublished estimates from the International Energy Agency, this means hopes of holding global warming to safe levels are now all but out of reach' - The Guardian 29 May 2011
-------------------------------- Dear Julia & Kevin, What is it with Australian politicians that they're more inclined to get rid of Prime Ministers than bicycle helmet laws? Kind regards, Freedom cyclist (content of email sent to 'would-be-if-they-could-be-PMs' 25/2/2012)
Sue,
ReplyDeleteYou have probably seen it but there is a great series on the War on the Motorist website about helmets. The final installment is here with links to the earlier ones:
http://waronthemotorist.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/appendix-bad-science-bingo-in-the-bmas-safe-cycling-pages/
It's well worth the read.
Thanks, Edward, great stuff!
ReplyDeleteHi Sue, some interesting findings from the global membership of the British Medical Journal reported in today's London Evening Standard
ReplyDelete"Bicycle helmets should not be made compulsory, doctors said today. The shock finding came in a poll of readers of the British Medical Journal.
More than two thirds of the journal's readers voted against mandatory cycle helmets for adults.
They said making helmet-wearing compulsory could deter people from taking up cycling - meaning they would not get the health benefits of added exercise."
Detail of the survey on the British Medical Survey website here:
http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2011/07/27/should-it-be-compulsory-for-adult-cyclists-to-wear-helmets/
Matt, so heartening to read all that!!!
ReplyDeleteThe Punk Commute yesterday was great and exhilarating but I never cease to be surprised by the raw aggression some people display when others are holding an opinion counter to the one they hold
The BMJ news is truly encouraging,