Ok - maybe just maybe...

(Images: Gif Bin)


...in moments like these, Big Helma could play a role!!!

Public safety & conflict of interest cancel each other out

(Photos: Georgie Abbott, The Netherlands)


I can see a parallel between sentiments raised in last Friday's SMH editorial on 'public safety & the Game Council', and that of 'public safety & Big Helma.

As the SMH editor points out...

'...business regulators cannot be monopolies selling a product for profit...'

thus

'...anti-doping agencies cannot promote sports dietary supplements...' - period.

So how is it that Standards Australia (with their publisher SAI Global) is allowed to operate as the quintessential monopoly, blatantly promoting their commercial standards to every single helmet manufacturer in Australia who must purchase them if they plan on selling a helmet or two?

As the SMH ed goes on to say, it is not possible to represent the interests of commercial businesses whilst simultaneously representing the interests of public safety. Furthermore...

'...the Independent Commission Against Corruption has warned for decades that "the perception of a conflict of interests" within regulatory bodies "can be as damaging as an actual conflict, because it undermines public confidence in the intergrity of the organisation"'.

Back to the comparative bicycle parallel, and it's hard to take any solace from interminable helmet studies that have continuously trickled from UNSW primarily because it's hard to believe it can ever be possible to undertake independent research funded by the very government which passed the legislation all those decades ago.

Has it been truth that has been sought or more a 'desired prescription' for helmets & helmet law?

I read a warning in the tea-leaves of the SMH editorial last week...

...beware the temptation to be 'both regulator and promoter' - it's not worth the public safety risk.

Cat on a hot chris..(TIN)..ania

The entire neighbourhood is intrigued by my bike!!!

It's Party-Time!...thank god for the Christiania

Home from Rome & having a party, BN2 gets ready for an Inner West Shin-dig!

What are narrow streets, congested roads, chocka-block car-parks in the scheme of party-things when you're lucky enought to have access to a Christiania?

...hmmmn after watching her beetle around yesterday, I can tell you quite catergorically...nothing!!!

Funtimes in a jiffy!!!!

Amsterdam & Berlin: No-Helmet Law Cities

(Photos: Georgie Abbott, Europe)

Have bike, will travel!!!
(...en niet een fietshelm overal, god zij dank!)



Have beetle, will sleep!!!
(... guten abend gute nacht!)

'If you go down to the woods today'...'big surprise' CANCELLED

(Images: Flickr, 'Forest Man', Asrar Makrani)


What a relief!

Following on from a flurry of leaked reports detailing the high risk of death and/or injury to hunters and picnic-ers, it would appear the O'Farrell government had no stomach for the looming proverbial train wreck on our National Parks' horizons after all.

Sure, it's only a temporary reprieve but maybe, just maybe, sanity will prevail and the whole sorry little venture will be mothballed once and for all.

It was always a mad plan; potentially even a vote-detracting-one, and begorra, you'd have to be a brave politician to face voters after a few inevitable 'al fresco annihilations'.

Open Post: hiring car in London...actually in congestion zone

Dear Mr Keppler,

I thought you might be interested to read why I will never use Europcar again.

Right from the start and upon our arrival at London St Pancras, it was not impressive to discover that signage to the Europcar 'Meet & Greet' location was invisible, nor, once we found ourselves in a multi-storey car park adjacent to the glamorous station potentially fitting your somewhat loose instructions listed on the internet booking form, that there was no-one from Europcar to actually 'Meet & Greet' us.

Neither was it impressive to be told by car-park booth-sitting attendants after our inquiries as to whether they could point us in your direction, that Europcar was nothing to do with them, and that as a matter of fact they only sometimes helped out by sometimes calling you when some of your customers turned up but that in reality there was nothing in it for them - 'just do them a favour sometimes.'

Neither was it impressive when we finally reached the actual Pick-Up spot after we'd been driven from the 'Meet & Greet' one, to discover that our rental allocation was a particularly dirty car - apparently you'd had insurmountable hose problems that day and due to this liquid-malfunction we were issued with an extremely grubby little golf - and neither was it impressive that no-one on the Europcar floor was able to give us any directions whatsoever to assist us getting out of London and/or finding the M3 - nor did they even possess a map they could (a) either give us or (b) show us.

But most unimpressive of all was the fact that at no point in time did your team at Europcar mention anything about the London Congestion Charge nor that St Pancras is pretty much in that Congestion Tax Zone (according to the Congestion Zone map).

That this information was omitted at both the internet booking phase and the Picking-Up phase is completely baffling, and one could be forgiven for thinking it was a trifle misleading and deceptive on your part. I am sure you would agree that to your rental car customers detail on congestion charging and zoning is significant information and certainly ought to have been shared at some point in the rental process.

I felt pretty 'snakey' about the dirty car but after receiving the congestion charge penalty I'm as mad as all hell...and just out interest because I'm beyond 'content', why did the salutation in your letter detailing the congestion charge address me as 'Dear Sirs'. Throughout our entire hiring-of-car negotiations I used my title and name (Mrs Susan Abbott) and at no point did I ever give you the impression that I was multiple men.

But back to the main issue at hand, I am not impressed by (a) the service or (b) the car that you allocated us and neither have I been impressed by the fact that you have automatically billed me £96 for the congestion tax which was basically an inevitable fait accompli given Europcar's St Pancras location. I fervently hope that you will return that amount to my relevant plastic poste haste.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,
Sue Abbott
(former Europcar customer)