Wednesday, April 6, 2016

No-one hates cyclists like Australian politicians

(Photo: Me & Dr Pete McInerney, Torbole, Italy taken by Enid McInerney)


It is no exaggeration to say that Australia is an outlier when it comes to sharing the roads with vulnerable road users. Now make that vulnerable road user a cyclist, and the nation fairly quivers with apoplexy especially our politicians.

In the state of New South Wales (NSW) where I live, the NSW Roads minister is a former truckie and it shows.

His approach to road safety for vulnerable roads users has completely missed the necessary point of providing actual road safety, and his new expanded Road Rules which entail whopping great fines for cyclists and future ID requirements have placed these cyclists on an equal footing with motorists in terms of culpability. Cyclists have been ‘frogmarched’ as equal partners into a road law of oppression and privilege notwithstanding that they are the vulnerable the road users. Cyclists have never been so at risk on Australian roads.

Now to spice up this very toxic mix of bicycle-demonisation let’s add a little mandatory bicycle helmet law, a veritable corporate cul-de-sac if ever there was one.

Through industry acrobatics and academic false promises, the framing of our very Australian mandatory helmet laws has become the dominant ideology in Australian bicycle culture over the past 25 years since they were ushered in.

Our comforting helmet-safety myth, in which all Australians are fully subscribed, is received wisdom and embedded in the Australian psyche across our entire sun-burnt country ... BUT ... by prescribing cycling safety through mandatory plastic-hat wearing, bicycle helmet laws have failed to articulate the actual and inherent danger of cycling which is the direct contact with motorised vehicles.

As a result the progressive erasure of everyday ordinary bicycles from Australian roads has been evident - oh yes, Big Oil, beloved by Australian politicians and their super accounts, rules here.

Now it gets personal because I am one of the unusual ones; female and middle-aged and still out there on my everyday ordinary bicycle … but not in their prescribed plastic headwear designed for sporty types and velodromes. No the hats I wear are big-brimmed ones for our rather steamy summers and woolly berets for our rather chilly winters.

As you can imagine this behaviour has not gone unnoticed by the authorities.

After 20 plus court appearances (with two more pending) I now have three criminal convictions for the Australian crime of riding a bicycle without a helmet - why heck with my criminal record I can’t even visit the United States!

Disillusioned yet determined to use my implied Australian right to participate in democracy and avail myself of the responsibility to petition for a redress of a grievance, I make it my business to contact the NSW Roads Department on a regular basis. The last communication I received from them informed me that 30% of cyclists who die on NSW roads are not wearing helmets. Employing their binary programme mentality and flipping their statistic, I assume they are also informing me that 70% of cyclists who die on NSW roads are wearing helmets which prima facie looks like cycling without a helmet is considerably safer.

But I digress … let’s check out emergency departments (EDs) in Sydney hospitals, where some eager-beaver doctors have widened the definition of brain injury to encompass unreported brain injuries … yes I am ‘fair dinkum’ … we now have this ‘silent majority’ noted in ED data and used to support mandatory helmet laws, one so silent as to be undetected by actual statistics or evidence!

To add to our miserable transport dilemma, our politicians are also aided and abetted by unelected yet ambitious middle-aged-men-in-lycra (mamils) running bicycle kingdoms, and let me tell you they adore that ‘silent majority’ paradigm.

The whole ‘bicycle safety via helmet compulsion’ issue in Australia is poisonous. Bullying prevails and kills off dissent in a most anti-intellectual manner. You only have to look back a couple of years when the eminent British neurosurgeon, Dr Henry Marsh, gave his expert opinion at the Hay Literary Festival that bicycle helmets were a waste of time. Holy moley, Australia fainted, and our media went into a frenzied melt-down, permitting evangelical-helmet opinions from non-expert bicycle bureaucrats to trump Dr Marsh’s expert one every time.

As a nation, we have truly embraced collective stupidity. We have allowed a boys’ locker room mentality to pedal the incoherence of helmet law safety concepts, and none of the elected or unelected folk involved in running NSW roads speak for cyclists like me, nor do they want to.

This is Australia, and we get what we’re prepared to put up with … sigh.

7 comments:

  1. Australia has actually done the world a great service by demonstrating the effects of mandatory helmet legislation. Thanks guys for helping to keep the rest of us safe from stupid anti-cycling legislation. We take our hats off to you all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why thank you, John!!!!
      ... sigh

      Delete
    2. You speak truer than you know: given the dreadful example of Australia and New Zealand, even the most bigoted cyclist-haters now fight shy of Oz-style helmet laws (...meaning they'd very much like to do it, but realise that the the workload of the police and the courts would be hugely increased, and that in less law-fixated societies any such legislation would be massively disregarded anyway, as it has been where you are in Spain).

      A raft of anti-cycling legislation is currently being prepared in Poland, where Kaczynski's PiS Party quite openly regards cyclists as a threat to the Polish nation on a par with gays, vegetarians, liberals and Je...sorry, rootless cosmopolitans. Poland will soon be the only country on the planet apart from North Korea to make cyclists carry licences. But even PiS has fought shy of a compulsory-helmets law. During the past four years proposals for mandatory laws in both Germany and France have been dismissed by the government citing the calamitous drop in Australian cycling levels.

      So keep up the good work, Australia: rough for those cyclists unfortunate enough to live in the benighted place, but a marvellous object lesson for the rest of the world.

      Delete
  2. Ha, your authorities can have a field day when they show up in my country! Only some little children and sport cyclists wear a helmet here in The Netherlands.
    People would be very angry when helmets would be compulsory.
    But then, several authorities are not anti cycling, some are pro cycling and most are for equal provisions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I envy you to almost a 'pathological' degree!!!!! How I wish Australia was THe Netherlands!

      Delete
  3. Freedom Cyclist, you and me both! I am a female bicycle commuter in Melbourne. I've spent time overseas, in China and Europe and never had to wear a helmet to comply with law. Having recently arrived back from a six month stint in The Netherlands, and reading up on the studies, I now too unlawfully ride without a helmet. And with our harsh sun I'd much rather have my hat on. Last week I was stopped by two police officers and was threatened with handcuffs and to be dragged down to the nearby police station. It was such a tasteless and cruel situation. Who would have thought, something so wholesome is criminal. I have pangs of anxiety now when I leave the house, but for the most part, it's people like you that stay in my thoughts. I hope our unruly behaviour is adopted on mass and I look forward to seeing how on earth they will police us. A much fitter police force may be in the pipes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why that's terrible regarding the threat of handcuffing you - how ridiculous! The nastiest I've had was being threatened with on-the-spot-impoundment of my bicycle which would have been interesting given this was a highway patrol policeman threatening me with this scenario and he was in a rather natty highway patrol car and I was on my big old dutch bike which was almost just as big as his car!!!!
      It's all so unnecessary and so very wrong.

      Delete