(Photos: Querida David, cycling Modena)
There is no class 1 evidence proving the spin of helmet promoters; only anecdotes!
Notwithstanding, we inexplicably commit ourselves to the proposed notion of promised protection without question, or evidence for that matter. In doing so we willingly become complicit in the criminalisation of individuals who have the temerity to dispute the actual protection capacity of these oil by-products.
We prosecute 'science' in order to uphold 'consumerism.'
Christopher Hitchens' classic comment encapsulates the very daftness of it all!...
..."extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
...so 'Dear Minister Borger,' how about granting me my longed-for helmet exemption because clearly claims of helmets can not stack up?!!!
On religious freedom
1 day ago